The Four Scored Multiple-Choice Sections
The current LSAT test structure consists of four 35-minute multiple-choice sections administered in a digital format. Following the significant revisions implemented in August 2024, the scored portion of the exam now features two sections of Logical Reasoning (LR) and one section of Reading Comprehension (RC). The fourth section is an unscored experimental variable, which can be either an additional LR or RC module. This configuration places a heavy premium on argumentative analysis, as Logical Reasoning now accounts for approximately 66% of a candidate's scaled score. Each scored section typically contains between 24 and 27 questions, totaling roughly 75 to 78 scored items per exam. Because the LSAT uses a Raw Score Conversion system, every question carries equal weight toward your final score, which ranges from 120 to 180. There is no penalty for incorrect answers, making it statistically advantageous to provide an answer for every item within the allotted time.
The Unscored Experimental Section
Every standard administration of the LSAT includes one unscored section, commonly referred to as the Variable Section. The Law School Admission Council (LSAC) utilizes this section to pre-test new questions and calibrate their difficulty levels for future exam forms. This process ensures that the Equating Process remains statistically sound, maintaining the consistency of the 120–180 scale across different test dates. The experimental section is indistinguishable from the scored sections; it will appear as either an extra Logical Reasoning or Reading Comprehension module. Because it is not identified during the test, candidates must treat all four sections with equal intensity. The placement of the experimental section is randomized, meaning it could appear at any point in the sequence, potentially impacting a test-taker's stamina if it occurs early or late in the testing window.
The Separate LSAT Writing Sample
While not included in the multiple-choice portion of the exam day, the LSAT Writing (now often called LSAT Argumentative Writing) remains a mandatory component of the testing requirements. This is a proctored, on-demand writing task that candidates complete remotely up to eight days prior to their multiple-choice test date. Although the writing sample is unscored, it is transmitted to every law school to which a candidate applies. Law school admissions committees use this essay to evaluate a student's ability to construct a coherent argument, synthesize evidence, and demonstrate writing proficiency under pressure. The task typically involves a Decision Prompt, where the test-taker must choose between two positions and defend their choice while acknowledging the merits of the alternative. Candidates are given 35 minutes to complete the essay, and a completed writing sample must be on file before LSAC will release the candidate's multiple-choice scores.
LSAT Logical Reasoning Section Details
Number of Questions and Timing
In the current LSAT logical reasoning format, each of the two scored LR sections contains 25 or 26 questions to be completed in 35 minutes. This allows for approximately 1 minute and 20 seconds per question, a pace that requires rapid processing of dense, argumentative text. The questions are generally arranged in a rough order of increasing difficulty, though this is not a strict rule. The first ten questions often involve more straightforward logical gaps, while the final third of the section frequently features complex Parallel Flaw or Necessary Assumption questions that demand deeper formal logic manipulation. Achieving a high score requires balancing speed on the easier questions to "bank" time for the more labor-intensive stimuli found later in the section.
Question Types and Skills Tested
The Logical Reasoning section assesses the ability to analyze, evaluate, and complete arguments. Each question consists of a short stimulus (usually a paragraph), a question stem, and five answer choices. Candidates must identify the Conclusion, the Premises, and the underlying Assumptions that link them. Common question tasks include identifying a flaw in the reasoning, strengthening or weakening an argument, or determining the point of disagreement between two speakers. Mastery of Conditional Logic—the relationship between sufficient and necessary conditions—is essential. You will frequently encounter "If-Then" statements that must be diagrammed or mentally mapped to avoid common errors like the Converse or Inverse fallacies. Understanding the specific requirements of each question stem is vital, as the strategy for a "Must Be True" question differs fundamentally from that of a "Strengthen" question.
Strategic Approaches for the Section
To excel in Logical Reasoning, candidates must adopt an active reading posture. This involves identifying the Logical Force of the author's claims—distinguishing between "some," "most," and "all." Many incorrect answer choices on the LSAT are designed to lure students who overlook these qualifiers. Another critical tactic is the Pre-phrasing technique: predicting the answer before looking at the choices. By identifying the gap in the stimulus's logic immediately after reading it, a candidate can more efficiently sift through the distractors. Additionally, because the LSAT is a "blind" test regarding content, you must remain objective. You are not being tested on your outside knowledge of the topic, but rather on the internal validity of the argument presented. Effectively using the "Flag" tool in the digital interface allows test-takers to skip time-consuming questions and return to them after securing points on more accessible items.
LSAT Reading Comprehension Section Breakdown
Passage Structure and Topics
The LSAT reading comprehension section consists of four sets of questions, each associated with a long-form passage or a pair of shorter "comparative" passages. The content is drawn from diverse academic disciplines, including the humanities, social sciences, biological and physical sciences, and the law. Each section typically includes one passage from each of these categories. The goal is not to test subject-matter expertise but to evaluate the ability to identify the Main Point, the author's tone, and the organizational structure of the text. One passage per section is usually presented as Comparative Reading, where two related texts (Passage A and Passage B) are provided. In these instances, questions will focus on the relationship between the two authors, such as points of agreement, disagreement, or differences in their respective scopes.
Question Categories and Complexity
Questions in the Reading Comprehension section range from literal "Global" questions to more abstract "Inference" and "Application" questions. Global questions ask for the primary purpose or the best title for the passage. Inference Questions require you to identify what must be true based on the text, even if it isn't explicitly stated. These are often the most difficult because they require a nuanced understanding of the author's perspective. Specific Reference questions point to a particular line or phrase, asking for its function within the larger context. The complexity often lies in the "distractor" answer choices, which may use "half-right" information—statements that are true according to the passage but do not actually answer the specific question asked. Understanding the Functional Role of each paragraph is often more important than memorizing the specific details within it.
Time Management for Reading Comp
With only 35 minutes to read four passages and answer 26 to 28 questions, time management is the primary hurdle in Reading Comprehension. This equates to roughly 8 minutes and 45 seconds per passage. Successful candidates often spend more time on the initial read—typically 2.5 to 3 minutes—to build a strong Mental Map of the text, which reduces the need to constantly re-read during the question phase. It is crucial to prioritize passages based on personal comfort; if you find science passages difficult, you might save that passage for last. The digital LSAT interface provides highlighting and underlining tools, but these should be used sparingly to avoid visual clutter. Instead, focus on identifying Transition Words (e.g., "however," "moreover," "consequently") that signal a shift in the author's argument or the introduction of a new viewpoint.
LSAT Analytical Reasoning (Logic Games) Update
Recent Format Changes (Post-August 2024)
Historically, the LSAT included a section known as Analytical Reasoning, or "Logic Games." This section required candidates to arrange items in sequences or groups based on a set of restrictive rules. However, following a legal settlement and extensive research by LSAC into the accessibility of the exam, the LSAT sections explained in modern prep materials no longer include this module. As of the August 2024 administration, the Analytical Reasoning section has been entirely removed from the scored exam. It has been replaced by a second scored Logical Reasoning section. This change was designed to ensure the test remains a fair assessment of the skills needed for legal study while removing a section that many argued was less representative of actual legal work than the LR and RC components.
Current Role of Logic Games
For students who began their preparation before 2024, the removal of Logic Games represents a significant shift in study focus. The current LSAT does not assess "Games" in any capacity. The skills previously tested in Analytical Reasoning—such as deductive inference and the ability to track multiple variables—are now indirectly assessed through the more complex Argumentative Reasoning questions found in the LR sections. While "Logic Games" may still appear in older practice tests (PrepTests), students preparing for current or future sittings should focus exclusively on LR and RC. The removal of this section has made the LSAT a more reading-intensive exam, as every scored section now consists of dense prose rather than diagram-heavy puzzles.
Resources for Understanding the Change
To adapt to this format change, candidates should utilize the updated LawHub library provided by LSAC. This platform contains "New Format" practice tests that reflect the two-LR, one-RC structure. When using older study materials, it is recommended to substitute the Analytical Reasoning section with an additional Logical Reasoning section from another test to simulate the current mental endurance required. Admissions offices are fully aware of this transition, and scores from the "old" format (with Logic Games) remain valid for five years. However, for those currently entering the cycle, the focus must remain on the LSAT sections explained in the post-2024 guidelines to ensure their practice matches the reality of the testing environment.
LSAT Section Timing and Pacing
The 35-Minute Per Section Rule
The 35-minute time limit per section is an absolute constraint on the LSAT. There is no "carrying over" time from one section to another; once the clock for Section 1 expires, you move immediately to Section 2. This creates a high-pressure environment where LSAT section timing breakdown mastery is as important as logical accuracy. The digital interface features a countdown timer in the upper right-hand corner. When the timer reaches the five-minute mark, it provides a warning. For many, this is the cue to begin making educated guesses on any remaining questions. Because there is no penalty for guessing, leaving a bubble blank is the only way to guarantee a zero percent chance of points. Developing a "buffer" by completing easier questions quickly is the hallmark of a high-scoring candidate.
Managing Your Pace Across Different Sections
Pacing strategies differ between Logical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension. In Logical Reasoning, you should aim to complete the first 10-12 questions in approximately 10-12 minutes, leaving the remaining 23-25 minutes for the more complex arguments at the end. In Reading Comprehension, the pace is more rhythmic; you must strictly limit yourself to 8-9 minutes per passage. If a particular passage is exceptionally dense, you must make the tactical decision to guess on the most difficult questions in that set to ensure you have time to read the fourth passage, which might be significantly easier. This Strategic Sacrifice prevents a single difficult item from sabotaging your performance on an entire section.
Practicing with Realistic Timed Conditions
Effective preparation requires more than just knowing the material; it requires acclimating to the LSAT test structure under timed pressure. Students should transition from untimed "drill" sessions to timed sections as early as possible. Initially, this might involve "proctored" practice where you give yourself 35 minutes for a single section. Eventually, you must simulate the full test day by taking four sections in a row with only the official 10-minute break. This builds the Mental Stamina necessary to maintain focus into the third and fourth hours of the exam. Using a digital platform that mimics the LSAC LawHub interface is essential to ensure that your interaction with the screen—highlighting, flagging, and clicking—becomes second nature.
Understanding the Experimental Section
Purpose of the Experimental Section
The unscored experimental section is a vital part of the LSAT's Validity and Reliability framework. By embedding new questions within a live test environment, LSAC can gather data on how actual candidates perform on them. This data allows psychometricians to determine the difficulty of each question and ensure that future exams are not unfairly weighted toward one topic or difficulty level. This process is what allows the LSAC to claim that a 165 on a June test represents the same level of ability as a 165 on an October test. Without the experimental section, the LSAT would struggle to maintain its status as a standardized metric for law school admissions.
How to Identify It (You Can't)
A common mistake among test-takers is trying to identify the experimental section during the exam to "save energy." However, the experimental section is designed to be indistinguishable from the scored sections. It will use the same formatting, the same types of questions, and the same level of polish. The only hint you might have is the Section Count; for example, if you encounter two Reading Comprehension sections, you know one of them is experimental, as the standard scored format only includes one. However, you will have no way of knowing which of the two is the one that counts. Attempting to guess which section is unscored is a high-risk strategy that frequently results in candidates underperforming on a section that was, in fact, scored.
Why You Must Treat Every Section as Scored
Because of the inability to identify the unscored module, the only viable strategy is to treat every section as if it is the most important one on the test. This requires a high degree of Psychological Discipline. If you find a section particularly grueling, you cannot afford to let your performance slip in the next section by assuming the previous one was the experimental one. Conversely, if a section feels unusually easy, do not assume it was the unscored "test" section. The LSAT is a marathon of focus, and the experimental section is a hurdle designed to test your consistency. Maintaining a uniform level of effort across all four modules ensures that you do not accidentally "throw away" the section that determines your final scaled score.
Test Day Logistics and Flow
Check-in and Security Procedures
Whether taking the LSAT at a testing center or via remote proctoring, the check-in process is rigorous. For remote testers, the ProctorU (or current LSAC partner) platform requires a 360-degree room scan to ensure the environment is free of prohibited items like cell phones, smartwatches, or unauthorized scratch paper. You are permitted five sheets of blank scratch paper, a pencil, and an eraser. Security protocols also include an ID check and a scan of your workspace. Failure to adhere to these "Candidate Agreement" rules can lead to an immediate termination of the test session or a flag on your file. Understanding these logistics beforehand reduces anxiety on the morning of the exam, allowing you to focus entirely on the how many sections on the LSAT question at hand.
The Order of Sections on Test Day
The sequence of the four sections on the LSAT is randomized for every test-taker. One student might start with two Logical Reasoning sections, while another might start with Reading Comprehension followed by the experimental section. This randomization is a security measure to prevent cheating and to ensure that section order does not unfairly benefit certain candidates. You will see the first two sections, followed by a scheduled break, and then the final two sections. Because you cannot predict the order, you must be prepared to pivot your mental strategy instantly. For instance, moving from the microscopic analysis of a Logical Reasoning stimulus to the macroscopic synthesis of a Reading Comprehension passage requires a quick Cognitive Shift.
Utilizing Your 10-Minute Break Effectively
The LSAT provides one scheduled 10-minute break between the second and third sections. This is the only time you are permitted to leave the view of the camera (for remote testers) or leave your seat (at a center). During this time, it is essential to physically decompress. Basic physiological maintenance—stretching, hydrating, and a quick snack—can help mitigate the Decision Fatigue that sets in during the latter half of the exam. When you return, you will undergo a brief re-check of your environment before the third section begins. Using this break effectively to reset your mindset is often the difference between a strong finish and a late-game score drop. Treat the break as a "hard reset" for your brain, leaving any frustrations from the first two sections behind.