How to Write Good FRQ for AP Physics C: Understanding the Scoring Rubric
How Points Are Allocated: Setup, Execution, Answer
In the AP Physics C: Mechanics exam, the FRQ scoring rubric mechanics are designed to reward the physics process rather than just numerical accuracy. A typical 15-point question is broken down into specific discrete tasks. The "Setup" phase usually earns the first point; this involves identifying the correct fundamental principle, such as stating $\sum F = ma$ or $E_i = E_f$. Graders look for a clear starting point that reflects the physical reality of the problem.
Execution points are awarded for the intermediate steps of a solution. This includes the substitution of given values or variables into your starting equations and the subsequent algebraic or calculus-based manipulation. For instance, if a problem requires finding the work done by a variable force, you earn points for setting up the integral $\int F \cdot dx$ with the correct limits of integration. Finally, the "Answer" point is reserved for the correct final value or expression. Crucially, if you provide the correct answer without any supporting work, you will likely receive zero points. The rubric is a roadmap of your logic, and skipping steps is equivalent to leaving points on the table.
The Role of 'Partial Credit' in Multi-Part Questions
One of the most vital components of an AP Physics C free response strategy is understanding how partial credit functions across sub-parts (e.g., a, b, and c). The College Board employs a "consistent-with-previous-work" policy. If you calculate an incorrect acceleration in part (a) but use that incorrect value correctly in part (b) to find the displacement, you can still earn full credit for part (b).
This system prevents a single mathematical slip from cascading into a total loss of points for the entire 15-point block. To capitalize on this, you must show your work explicitly. If you arrive at an answer for part (a) that feels physically impossible—such as a coefficient of friction greater than 10—write a brief note saying, "I know this value is unrealistic, but I am using it for subsequent parts." This signals to the grader that you understand the physics even if your arithmetic failed you. This transparency ensures that your conceptual knowledge is still rewarded through the consistency point mechanism.
Common Reasons for Point Deductions
Understanding what do AP Physics C graders look for also means knowing what they penalize. A frequent pitfall is the "bald answer"—a numerical result without units or supporting work. In AP Physics C, units are mandatory for all final numerical answers. Failing to include "Joules" for a calculation of Work (physics) or "radians per second" for angular velocity will result in an automatic deduction of the final point for that section.
Another common error is the misuse of signs in vector equations. For example, in a pulley system, failing to define a consistent coordinate system often leads to incorrect signs for acceleration or tension. If your work shows $T - mg = ma$ and $T + Mg = Ma$ for the same string, the grader will recognize a fundamental flaw in your free-body analysis. Additionally, using "calculator talk"—writing out commands like fnInt(X^2, X, 0, 5) instead of standard mathematical notation—is often ignored or penalized. You must translate your calculator's operations into the formal language of calculus to meet the standards of the rubric.
The Essential Structure of a High-Scoring Response
Stating the Governing Principle First
Every high-scoring FRQ response should begin with a "first principle." This is a general law of physics that applies to the scenario before any specific variables are inserted. Examples include the Work-Energy Theorem, the Law of Universal Gravitation, or the Conservation of Angular Momentum. By writing $L_i = L_f$ at the top of a rotational collision problem, you immediately secure the "concept" point and provide a framework for your subsequent math.
Starting with a specific formula like $v^2 = v_0^2 + 2a(x-x_0)$ is acceptable for constant acceleration, but for more complex problems, starting with the differential form $a = dv/dt$ or $F = dp/dt$ is often necessary. This habit prevents you from accidentally using a specialized formula in a situation where its assumptions don't hold—such as using kinematic equations for an object experiencing non-constant force. The goal is to prove to the grader that you are not just memorizing recipes, but applying the foundational laws of mechanics.
Showing Clear Mathematical Steps (Not Just Algebra)
Writing clear physics derivations is a core competency for the AP Physics C exam. You are expected to bridge the gap between your starting principle and your final answer with a logical progression. This does not mean you must show every single long-division step, but you must show the "physics-heavy" transitions. If you are solving a differential equation for terminal velocity, you should show the separation of variables: $\int \frac{dv}{g - (b/m)v} = \int dt$.
Skipping directly from the force equation to the final velocity expression often results in lost points because the grader cannot verify your calculus proficiency. A good rule of thumb is to include a step whenever you perform a substitution, an integration, or a significant algebraic rearrangement (like isolating a variable under a square root). If the question asks you to "derive," the rubric specifically looks for the transition from a general equation to the final form requested. Clear vertical alignment of your equations helps the grader follow your path and ensures you don't lose a term during the process.
Boxing Final Answers and Including Correct Units
In the high-pressure environment of the exam, it is easy to leave your final result buried in a sea of scribbles. Maximizing points on free response requires making the grader's job as easy as possible. Always box your final answer. This serves as a definitive signal that you have completed the task and allows the grader to quickly verify the result before looking back through your work to award partial credit.
Furthermore, the final answer must be physically complete. For numerical problems, this means the correct number of significant figures (usually two or three) and the appropriate units. For symbolic derivations, ensure your answer is expressed only in terms of the variables specified in the prompt. If the question asks for an answer in terms of $M$, $R$, and fundamental constants, and your final box includes $v$ (a variable you introduced), you will not receive the final point. Double-check that your symbolic expressions are simplified and that any intermediate variables have been substituted out.
Mastering Different FRQ Question Types
Strategy for Experimental Design & Data Analysis Questions
Experimental design questions test your ability to apply the scientific method within a mechanics context. These often require you to describe a procedure to determine a physical quantity, such as the spring constant $k$ or the moment of inertia $I$. Your response must be specific: name the tools (e.g., a photogate, a motion sensor, or a meter stick) and explain exactly what is being measured.
When asked to analyze data, you will frequently be required to linearize a graph. For instance, if you are investigating the period of a simple pendulum $T = 2\pi\sqrt{L/g}$, you might be asked what to plot to achieve a straight line. You should state that plotting $T^2$ versus $L$ yields a slope of $4\pi^2/g$. In the data analysis phase, always draw a Best-Fit Line that has roughly equal points above and below it. Never use your data points to calculate the slope; instead, pick two distinct points on the line you drew and show the $\Delta y / \Delta x$ calculation clearly. This demonstrates an understanding of how to minimize experimental error.
Approach to Derivations and Proofs
Derivation questions are the hallmark of Physics C. These questions often start with the prompt "Derive an expression for..." or "Show that...". The key here is to start from the most basic level possible. If you are proving the parallel axis theorem or deriving the velocity of a cylinder rolling down an incline, begin with the Work-Energy Theorem or the sum of torques $\sum \tau = I\alpha$.
In these problems, the rubric often awards a point for the "substitution of a specific relationship," such as replacing $v$ with $\omega r$ for a rolling-without-slipping condition. If the question is a "show that" type, the final answer is already given to you. In this case, the points are entirely in the derivation. You cannot work backward from the answer; you must move forward from the principles. If you get stuck, try to find a middle ground—write down the relevant relationships you know must be involved, such as the formula for the moment of inertia of a disk, to scavenge setup points.
Tackling Context-Rich, Multi-Step Word Problems
Some FRQs present a complex narrative, such as a satellite changing orbits or a block sliding down a variable-friction track into a spring. These problems require a multi-stage strategy. First, break the motion into distinct phases: Phase 1 (sliding), Phase 2 (collision), and Phase 3 (compression).
For each phase, identify which conservation laws apply. Is momentum conserved during the collision? Is mechanical energy conserved during the slide? Often, these problems require you to take the output of one phase (like the post-collision velocity) and use it as the input for the next. Using clear subscripts like $v_{1f}$ and $v_{2i}$ helps keep your work organized. Graders appreciate when you label these phases, as it shows a high level of conceptual organization. If a problem involves a variable force $F(x)$, remember that you must use integration to find the work done; applying $W = Fd$ is a common high-level error that results in zero points for that section because the formula is inapplicable to the given physics.
Communication and Presentation for the Grader
Using Concise Physics Explanations and Justifications
Many FRQ parts ask you to "Justify your answer" or "Explain your reasoning." These are not invitations to write an essay. Instead, use the Claim-Evidence-Reasoning (CER) framework. Start with a direct claim (e.g., "The tension increases"). Follow with evidence, which in physics is usually a law or a mathematical relationship (e.g., "According to $\sum F = ma$, if the mass increases while acceleration is constant, the net force must increase").
Avoid vague language like "the object wants to move." Instead, use precise terminology: "the object's inertia," "the net external torque," or "the centripetal component of the normal force." If a question asks why a graph is linear, point to the governing equation and show that it fits the form $y = mx + b$. Concise, punchy sentences are easier for graders to read and less likely to contain contradictory statements that could void your credit. Remember, if you provide a correct explanation but follow it with a physically incorrect statement, the grader may be forced to dock points for the contradiction.
Creating Effective Diagrams and Graphs
Visual representations are often worth several points on the FRQ. The most common is the Free-Body Diagram (FBD). When drawing an FBD, follow these strict rules: only draw forces (not components), start the force vectors on the dot representing the object, and point them in the correct direction. Never include "centripetal force" as a separate label; instead, label the actual force (like tension or friction) providing the centripetal acceleration.
When sketching graphs, pay attention to the requested features. If the prompt asks for a sketch of velocity vs. time for an object reaching terminal velocity, the curve must start at the origin (if $v_0=0$), be concave down, and asymptotically approach a horizontal line. Graders look for these specific geometric features—intercepts, slopes, and curvature. Label your axes with the correct variables and units. If you are asked to "plot" points, do so accurately; if you are asked to "sketch," focus on the qualitative shape and key points like maxima or intercepts.
Neatness and Organization for Readability
While you are not graded on handwriting, you are graded on the ability of the reader to understand your work. If a grader cannot follow the flow of your derivation, they cannot award partial credit. Work vertically whenever possible. If you make a mistake, draw a single line through it rather than scribbling it out into an illegible blotch.
Use the space provided efficiently. If you need to jump to another part of the page, use arrows to guide the reader. A well-organized response often includes a brief header for each part, such as "Part (c): Finding the maximum height." This level of organization not only helps the grader but also helps you stay focused during the exam. It allows you to quickly check if you have answered every part of the prompt. Often, students lose points simply because they forgot to answer a small sub-question like "Does the speed increase, decrease, or stay the same?" amid their complex calculations.
Advanced Tactics for Complex Problems
Leveraging the 'Follow-Through' Credit Rule
Advanced candidates know how to play the "follow-through" rule to their advantage. If you are stuck on part (a) and cannot find a numerical value for the acceleration of a block, do not give up on parts (b) and (c). Instead, assume a value—or better yet, assign a variable like $a_0$—and proceed with the rest of the problem using that placeholder.
State clearly: "Assuming the acceleration from part (a) is $5 \text{ m/s}^2$..." or "Let the acceleration from part (a) be $a$." You will lose the points for part (a), but you can earn 100% of the points for the subsequent parts if your logic is sound based on that assumption. This tactic is essential for maintaining momentum. The worst thing you can do is leave three parts of a question blank because you couldn't solve the first one. The FRQ scoring rubric mechanics are designed to be modular; use that modularity to protect your score.
Handling Problems with Symbolic Answers Only
AP Physics C frequently asks for answers "in terms of $m, L, g,$ and $\theta$." This requires a different mindset than numerical problem-solving. In these cases, you must treat your variables like numbers. A common mistake is leaving a variable in the final expression that was not part of the "given" list. For example, if you are asked for the final velocity of a rolling sphere and your answer includes the moment of inertia $I$, but $I$ was not a given variable, you must substitute $I = \frac{2}{5}mR^2$ into the equation.
Dimensional analysis is your best friend here. Before you box a symbolic answer, check the units. If you are solving for a time $t$ and your expression is $\sqrt{2h/g}$, the units are $\sqrt{m / (m/s^2)} = \sqrt{s^2} = s$. If your expression had been $\sqrt{2gh}$, the units would be $\sqrt{(m/s^2)m} = m/s$, which is a velocity. This quick check can alert you to an algebraic error—like forgetting to divide by a variable—before you finalize your response.
What to Do When You're Unsure of the Path Forward
When faced with a problem that seems impenetrable, fall back on the "Fundamental Five" of mechanics: Newton's Second Law, Work-Energy, Impulse-Momentum, Rotational Dynamics, and Universal Gravitation/Oscillations. Write down the equations for the laws that seem most relevant. Even if you don't know how to solve the system, writing $\tau = rF \sin\theta$ or $p = mv$ can earn a "recognition of principle" point.
Look for clues in the wording. The phrase "at the moment the string is cut" suggests an initial condition problem where acceleration is non-zero but velocity is zero. "Long after the switch is closed" (in an RC circuit context, though less common in pure mechanics) or "after a long time" usually implies a steady-state where a derivative (like $dv/dt$) has become zero. By identifying these boundary conditions and writing them down, you demonstrate to the grader that you understand the physical constraints of the system, which is often worth points even without a full solution.
Practice and Self-Grading Methodology
Using Official Scoring Guidelines to Grade Your Own Work
True mastery of the FRQ comes from practicing with past exams and, crucially, using the official Scoring Guidelines to evaluate your performance. When you grade your own work, be ruthless. Do not give yourself the point if you "meant" to include a unit but forgot. Look at the specific "Notes" in the rubric, which often explain why certain variations of an answer are accepted or rejected.
This process reveals the patterns in how points are awarded. You will notice, for example, that a point is almost always given for a correct substitution of limits into an integral, or for correctly identifying the direction of a friction force. By internalizing these patterns, you begin to write your responses with the rubric in mind, reflexively including the steps that you know the graders are looking for. This shifts your focus from just "getting the answer" to "earning the points."
Identifying Missing Elements in Your Responses
As you self-grade, keep a tally of why you lose points. Are you consistently losing the "unit point"? Are you failing to show the integration step? Do you struggle with the "Justify" questions? Identifying these gaps allows you to create a targeted improvement plan.
For many students, the missing element is the connection between the math and the physics. If you have a page full of equations but no words, practice adding "bridge phrases" like "By conservation of momentum..." or "Setting the derivative of potential energy to zero to find the equilibrium point...". These phrases act as signposts for the grader and ensure that your mathematical work is interpreted correctly. If your diagrams are messy, practice drawing them larger; a tiny, cramped FBD is a common source of self-inflicted errors and grader confusion.
Building a Template for Common Problem Types
To increase speed and accuracy, develop a mental (or written) template for common FRQ scenarios. For a "Block on an Incline" problem, your template should always include: 1) A tilted FBD, 2) Breaking gravity into $mg \sin\theta$ and $mg \cos\theta$ components, and 3) Summing forces in the $x$ and $y$ directions. For a "Variable Force" problem, your template should involve: 1) The Work-Energy Theorem, 2) An integral setup with limits, and 3) Solving for $v$ or $x$.
Having these templates ready allows you to bypass the "panic phase" when you first read a question. You can immediately begin the mechanical process of setting up the problem, which often clears the mental fog and allows you to see the path to the solution. This structured approach is the hallmark of an advanced physics student and is the most effective way to ensure a high score on the AP Physics C: Mechanics FRQ section.